Picture Yourself Paying Tuition at Emerson

This Saturday, the Emerson College Student Union welcomed the class of 2024 at the “Picture Yourself at Emerson” event and invited them to picture themselves paying tuition at Emerson. We organized our presence around the simple fact that every student deserves to know all of the financial facts when they make a college decision.

For many of us, especially first generation students, Emerson’s annual tuition and room and board increases come as a devastating surprise. In an attempt to spare other students from this struggle, we handed accepted students and their parents flyers informing them about Emerson’s pattern of increasing tuition and room and board every year since 2010. We also invited them to schedule 1-on-1 meetings with ECSU members who are current Emerson students to learn more about attending Emerson. Students Supporting Survivors collaborated on this event with us as well, and we handed out a flyer they made about Title IX at Emerson.

We do not aim to discourage students from attending Emerson—we just want to give them crucial financial planning information that the college neglects to mention on its “Facts and Figures” page.

Emerson College should halt tuition and room and board increases made without student consent. Students do not currently have voting representation on the Board of Trustees. We do not get to hear “the pitch” for why an increase is necessary until it is already decided on; we are just expected to pay. This has a crushing effect on low-income students, as demonstrated through stories we collected in our #ECStudentsSpeakOut series. 

Many students are going thousands of dollars in debt, working full-time hours in addition to being full-time students, and skipping meals to attend Emerson. Tuition increases cause some students to lose access to Emerson entirely. As one sophomore writes, “Having an increase will probably end with me changing schools or my parents going broke because of me.” It’s time for the exploitation of students to end. It’s time for students to have a voice (and a vote) in the places where decisions are made. The ECSU urges the college to repeal the 3.5% tuition increase for the 2020-21 school year and come to the bargaining table with us.

Our Picture Yourself at Emerson demonstration follows in a legacy of powerful expressions during this event, such as the 2018 staff union’s “Picture Yourself Working at Emerson” demonstration and Stand in Solidarity for the Survivors of Sexual Assault at Emerson College’s 2015 “Accepted Students Awareness” demonstration. We are proud to be part of this tradition.

Unpacking Lee Pelton’s Email Re: the 2020-21 Tuition Increase

On February 18, 2020, a student sent this email to President Lee Pelton as part of our phone bank, urging him to not go forward with the college’s plan to increase tuition by 3.5% for the 2020-21 school year.

We are posting Lee Pelton’s email response here along with our comments fact-checking his statement. We redacted the student’s name to protect their privacy. Several other students have reported to us that they received the same email after emailing him about the increase.

Some lines in Pelton’s email are word-for-word copied directly from his 2019 state of the college speech. We highlighted these sentences to mark them as such.

Click here to read his 2019 state of the college speech. Click here for a screenshot of the original email.

Dear [Student’s name redacted],

Thank you so very much for your note. Please know that the Board of Trustees and I are aware of the economic and financial pressures that you and other students face. It is for this reason that the College has begun a program to decrease the rate of tuition charges over time.

We’re glad you’re aware of the severity of the situation! Can we see evidence of this tuition decrease program? Will you make the board meeting minutes public? Unfortunately, many of us who are dropping out, going hungry, and taking on debt right now don’t have time to wait for a slow-moving program.

However, a 0% increase in tuition would have a devastating impact on the quality of your education that would include fewer faculty, larger class sizes and a reduction in many of the services that are important to student engagement and educational experiences.

Whoa, Mr. President! You said a lot of scary things right there but didn’t give any sources.

Luckily, we did our own research. Next year, the college is going to gain Marlboro’s $30M endowment and its real estate holdings appraised at more than $10M. Will the college really crumble without the additional $2 million this 3.5% increase would extort from students?

The $2 million was calculated like this (the 2.5% accounts for inflation):
$1,700 increase x current undergrad enrollment – (2.5% of current tuition x current enrollment) = $2 million revenue

I should point out that financial aid increased by almost $3M dollars this year and $19M in the last six years to support students from middle- and lower-income families.

We should point out that the individual amount of aid given to students has not increased proportionally to the tuition (not to mention the housing cost) increases.

The college spent $24 million dollars to buy 172 Tremont—that’s $5 million more than it’s spent on increasing financial aid over the last 6 years! Which is a higher priority—real estate or students going hungry?

Last year, we made significant cuts in our operating budget—mostly invisible to faculty, staff and students—to reduce the tuition percentage increase and increase financial aid. 

We’d love to fact check you on this, Mr. President, but unfortunately we can’t. Why isn’t the budget publicly available for all of us to see? What is the board afraid of?

It’s very condescending of you to reference this but not offer a source.

In FY ’19, we lowered the rate of increase of undergraduate tuition from 4.5% to 4.0%. I recognize that this was a very modest downward adjustment.

We also recognize that this is a very modest downward adjustment.

Especially because your salary has had a less-modest upward adjustment of 148.6% since 2011.

The Board of Trustees are committed to reducing  the rate of increase further, while, at the same time, renewing our commitment to financial aid over time. Neither of these can be achieved in a single year.

Obviously, reducing the rate of tuition increase while increasing financial aid concurrently—or put another way, decreasing a significant revenue source while increasing a significant expense—poses a serious challenge for the College even as we have made cuts in the last several years to bring students new programs, new academic programs that require new faculty and a significant upgrade in living, learning and community spaces on campus.

We agree that you must find it very challenging—considering that Emerson College currently ranks in 5th place out of 20 colleges on the Princeton Review’s “Financial Aid Not-So-Great-List.” (And when the class of 2021 were freshmen, Emerson ranked as #6, meaning student reports of financial aid experiences have gotten worse over just 4 years.)

The operating budget levers available to us to make significant budget reductions are not plentiful. The largest fraction of our FY ’20 operating budget is, as always, salary and benefits ($111M/41%), the vast majority of which is fixed because of faculty and staff union agreements going forward.

We hope you aren’t trying to deter students from supporting the faculty and staff unions—because we’ve talked to them and established that we’re all on the same team!

Additionally, we notice you did not mention the $307,643 dollars that went to pay increases for upper-level administration just between 2016-17 and 2017-18 school years. This includes the VP for Institutional Advancement’s salary, which went up by $129,032 alone. Faculty and staff do not receive pay increases to this scale, yet you lay blame on them for the rising tuition.

Labor, institutional student financial aid ($50M/18%), and debt service ($32M/12%) account for 71% of our $274M total expenses. Other capital related expenses, including operating and maintenance of buildings, deferred maintenance and information technology, and increased housing and food costs due to the Little Building going live account for an additional $41M (15%). In other words, these four major expenses account for more than 86% of our total annual expenses. The vast majority of these expenses are fixed costs.

This leaves $40 million unaccounted for. It also leaves us wondering what the full list of programs included under “other capital related expenses” is.

The cost of each of these areas above increases each year, including most notably, faculty and staff salaries which account for 40% of the operating budget. As I noted earlier, a 0% increase would have a significant negative impact on your classroom and overall academic experience.

The ECSU works closely with and supports the faculty and staff unions. The emphasis on this statement is a clear attempt to break up solidarity between students and working and middle class faculty.

Nevertheless, thank you for your note and your concern, which we will share with the Board at our upcoming meeting.

Best regards,

Lee

Lastly, what you didn’t say:

In the email below, the student told you about their experience with food insecurity and their friends being priced out of Emerson. So did many others. You did not respond to this story.

1 in 5 students don’t graduate from Emerson. Do you consider these students collateral? Do you consider low-income students disposable?

And if you don’t: stop treating us like we are. We are not going anywhere. We will win this tuition freeze. And we will keep coming back.

The email he responded to:

Dear President Pelton,

My name is [Student’s name redacted], and I’m a junior at Emerson. I want to make it clear that I do not support the 3.5% tuition increase. I am asking for the decision to be repealed.

In my 3 years at Emerson, I have seen several of my friends leave Emerson after being priced out of an education due to tuition increases. I have also seen my remaining friends skip meals, take out life-altering debt, and struggle to stay healthy as they work full time while studying full time. (And this is with the help of the student success fund—which is a great program, but doesn’t mitigate the cost of tuition.) I am already seeing my remaining friends here talk about potentially transferring or taking a gap year if this increase goes through.

No student should have to choose between  a quality education and financial stability. Emerson’s tuition has increased every year for the past 10 years, netting a total 54% increase since 2010. I am counting on you to break this pattern.

Please represent Emerson College and its proposed core values of respect, equal treatment, and diversity. Do not let the student body down—repeal the increase.

Thank you for your time,
[Student’s name redacted]

So why don’t we have just one manifesto?

The ECSU “Constitution” is an evolving document. As a non-hierarchical structure, all members can contribute to it. We each have our own reasons for joining, our own unique experiences, and our own ideas about what the union should and can be. These ideas have changed and will continue to change as we evolve our vision for the union. Additions to the manifesto will be documented here for anyone to access. 

Below are member’s thoughts on the need and role for an Emerson College Student Union from before our creation to now:

2019: EMERSON IS NOT LGBT FRIENDLY

Emerson College hosts professors, classes, and price tags that are hostile to students of color, of low income, and of the LGBTQ+ community. 

Emerson is not unique in this way, but it does market itself as a uniquely progressive institution, celebrating its ranking as the most LGBT+ friendly school in the nation by the Princeton Review. And some people believe that this means Emerson cares about us. And they do— if by “us” you mean the 65% of the Emerson population who are white, and especially if they are class-privileged. 

Emerson hosts LGBTQ+ friendly policies because I, and people like me, make up a significant portion of Emerson’s wallet. Our retention pays for Lee Pelton’s $800k a year salary. It pays to purchase and maintain empty buildings. It pays to employ professors who refuse to use nonbinary students pronouns and make statements like “Black people should get over slavery.” Emerson does not care about us. Emerson cares about our money.

As a white transgender man, I am accepted (both as a student and as a transgender person) into Emerson not because of Emerson’s “progressiveness,” but because my money is as green as anyone else’s. I do not lose my class privilege and white privilege because of my transness. At the end of the day, I can come up with the money to pay the ever-rising tuition that acts as a class gateway and ensures that “acceptance” at Emerson doesn’t extend into structural change. Emerson does not care about the LGBTQ+ community. It cares about the money we can give them.

Emerson cares about my “acceptance” because it is profitable to them, but it doesn’t give a damn about my liberation, or the liberation of any group.

This is obvious in the way Emerson has increased tuition for returning students by 4% every year for the past five years. This is obvious in the way Emerson handles financial aid, only meeting 50% of  student need on average and ignoring student phone calls and emails. This is obvious in the way that Emerson continues to be a deeply racist institution. This is obvious in the way that I have seen too many of my friends, equally as deserving of a college education as I am, leave Emerson because they have been priced out of a college they once considered their dream school.I’m sick of being told to trust an administration that does not care about its students. I refuse to wait for watered-down change to come from the higher-ups. It’s time for students to organize. It’s time for a Student Union. It’s time for us to care for each other— because if we don’t, no one will.

2019: A call for an Emerson Student Union

To the Students reading this:
As exemplified by the recent scandal revealing bribery to gain access to prestigious universities, the people who control our colleges and universities care more about making the most money possible than young people’s education. Higher Education sets its ideals upon values of exploration, seeking knowledge, and expression. Instead, modern universities exist as job preparatory programs. Extended, unpaid internships to build enough experience to hopefully leverage a job once leaving. While providing hours of work and sinking tens of thousands of dollars (our own or a banks) into the school, the school takes our money and decides where they would like to use it. 

Frankly, I am sick of being buried under a mountain of debt. I am sick of watching the people I care about lose the education they worked so hard for because of another bout of tuition raises. I am sick of seeing the most passionate students I know make the choice between taking more hours at their job, or losing their access to Emerson altogether. I am sick of watching friends not eat for days because they can’t afford food and a T pass. Enough is enough

We need an organization that pushes fearlessly against the administration until it is understood that they are pushing people out, and putting people in danger. We need an organization that doesn’t stop at one issue, but is a place for any issue to be discussed and demanded. We need an organization whose goal is for systematic change in the way our education is structured. We need an organization that hears the needs of students and acts on it. We need an organization that is organized by students, for students, and nothing else

We are students for the expansion of rights for students. We are students for racial justice in higher education. We are students for justice for all people on the gender spectrum. We are students for the end of exploitation of students. We are students for equitable treatment of staff and faculty. We are students for the end of the injustice of graduate students’ exploited labor. We are students for the cooperative ownership of education. We are the Emerson College Student Union. 

To the education profiteers reading this:

Emerson College’s motto is “Expression necessary to Evolution.” This is us taking control of the evolution of this institution. This is us telling you what we need. You can ignore us for now, but not for long. We will scream, rally, sit-in, protest, scheme, and rattle our cage until you hear us. You will curse our expression. That will not stop us. 

Only Evolution will.

2019: Let’s Do Something About It

Emerson costs too much. That’s not controversial, 62% of Emerson students receive some kind of financial aid to help with the cost. It’s a well known and publicized issue. Why, then, did the College raise Emerson’s price tag 5% last semester without raising financial aid? Maybe Emerson didn’t have enough money to shoulder their new debt from the Little Building, maybe they wanted to buy the former Griddler’s for $1 million, maybe… Or, maybe the people who run Emerson are greedy assholes. That could be possible too. The truth is, the college never asked us. They might’ve let us know through Lee Pelton’s email or maybe they told the SGA representatives that some 30 of our classmates voted for whenever voting happened. I don’t know, I live off campus like at least half of us and always seem to miss the memo. Maybe I’m just uninformed. Maybe you believe their official reasoning for the tuition rise. But, do you think what they told us is what they presented to the board? Shouldn’t they tell us that? Emerson College never asked permission before raising our tuition. If they had, maybe we would know why, and maybe we would have decided it wasn’t worth it. 

So, why does College cost so much? Why raise tuition at all? If you listen to Lee Pelton TV, you’d hear how college is an inefficient service that costs too much by nature. The idea is that instead of costing too much, college is too cheap for what we get. “Financial Aid hasn’t risen this year but it’s largely kept up with rising tuition rates” is practically the Party Line (repeated by Lee Pelton himself on WBUR last semester). But we were never asked if we wanted the extra buildings, or the Alexas in the elevator, or new Macs, or flourishes designed by outside marketing firms. Maybe if we didn’t buy those things we wouldn’t have had to raise tuition. We might have decided to trade a couple grand each for new space for orgs or for the e on our desktops, but the point is we never got a choice. Sometimes we ask nicely during the president’s office hours. Sometimes we put together protests that demand change and sometimes they listen to at least some of our demands but they don’t always. Sometimes they choose to ignore us. We don’t have that choice. We have to pay. 

We can choose whether to go here or not, but either way we’re at their mercy. Not all of our credits transfer and if we don’t finish we have nothing to show for our money. For many that isn’t really a choice. Sometimes you need to cough up the extra 5%. Why? Our money is paying for the school and for the salaries of the people running it. What if we all stopped paying? What if we had voting representation on the board in exchange for our money and could all veto every decision? What if whoever decides to buy new buildings had to tell us why we needed it, and how much it would raise our tuition, and we could say no? What if we banded together and said no more tuition raises? What if they asked permission before they used our money, or we all stop paying? What if they needed to listen? Let’s unionize Emerson Undergrads. Let’s start today. 

2019: Fighting for a better Emerson

At the heart of it all (and the heart of our Union) we want to bring class equity to Emerson College. Too many of us have seen our classmates get priced out of this College. Too many of us struggle to stay as ever-climbing tuition pushes us into debt. And too many of us feel the crushing weight of these problems but feel powerless to solve them.

Our care for each other and ourselves is what makes this heart beat. We cannot claim student power on an administrative level without also claiming the power we have to support one another. That’s why we created a meal swipes exchange group so students without meal plans can get swiped into the DH. It’s why we created a Disorientation Guide sharing the truths we wish we had known when we entered Emerson. And it’s why we’re committed to expanding our on-campus food pantry to include more food and healthier options, because every student, regardless of income, deserves a nutritious meal.

We are creating and demanding these forms of aid because we know from experience that Emerson will only meet our cries for change with a promise of “conversation.” The time for “conversation” has passed. The conversation they want has already happened. It gets rehashed every year when the inevitable news of another tuition increase hits. We have sustained this conversation on our own without response for long enough. We need policy change. We need a tuition decrease. We need voting representation on the board of trustees. These necessary changes aren’t going to come from appealing to the benevolence of an institution that has proven itself time and time again to have none.

They are going to come from us– the students, banded together in all of our power. Emerson’s administration knows what they are doing to us. They just don’t care.We, the students, must care for each other. Capitalism depends on our alienation from one another and ourselves. Our college thrives on it. Acts of kindness and connection are radical acts of resistance. This October, let’s challenge ourselves to look out for one another. Let’s build this union on a foundation of solidarity.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started